Shaping an international agreement on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: Lessons from high seas fisheries

Blasiak, Robert and Yagi, Nobuyuki, (2016). Shaping an international agreement on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: Lessons from high seas fisheries. Marine Policy, 71 210-216

Document type:
Article

Metadata
Links
Versions
Statistics
  • Sub-type Journal article
    Author Blasiak, Robert
    Yagi, Nobuyuki
    Title Shaping an international agreement on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: Lessons from high seas fisheries
    Appearing in Marine Policy   Check publisher's open access policy
    Volume 71
    Publication Date 2016-09
    Place of Publication Amsterdam
    Publisher Elsevier B.V.
    Start page 210
    End page 216
    Language eng
    Abstract A decade of international discussion on marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction (BBNJ) culminated in 2015 with a United Nations General Assembly Resolution to establish an international legally-binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of BBNJ. Proponents of the new instrument therefore consider it as an opportunity to eliminate gaps in the current legal regime and promote better coordination. As the next step in the negotiations begins, substantial lessons can be drawn from the 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA), which has faced many of the same challenges related to gaps in scientific knowledge, uneven governance and regulatory capacities, and inherent unpredictability, both ecologically and in terms of anthropogenic drivers of change. For BBNJ, however, such challenges are far more complex due to the diversity of stakeholder communities and the diversity of resources involved, including fish and mineral resources with tangible economic values, marine genetic resources of unknown value, and the culturally-specific values attached to charismatic species and conservation in general. Drawing on lessons from UNFSA, it is argued that the establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) under the BBNJ instrument would be particularly well served by a similar regional approach aligned with existing international agreements. In this regard, it is recommended that the capacity building under the new international instrument on BBNJ should focus inter alia on the secretariats of the regional fishery management organizations in order to enhance intra-regional and inter-regional cooperation and sharing of best practices.
    Keyword BBNJ
    Information asymmetries
    Marine protected areas
    Marine genetic resources
    Multi-stakeholder engagement
    UN Fish Stocks Agreement
    Copyright Holder Elsevier Ltd.
    Copyright Year 2016
    Copyright type All rights reserved
    ISSN 0308-597X
    DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.004
  • Versions
    Version Filter Type
  • Citation counts
    Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
    Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
    Access Statistics: 748 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
    Created: Wed, 15 Jun 2016, 12:59:45 JST by Makiko Arima on behalf of UNU IAS