The policy relevance of absolute and relative poverty headcounts: What's in a number?
Notten, Geranda and de Neubourg, Chris (2007). The policy relevance of absolute and relative poverty headcounts: What's in a number?. Maastricht University.
Document type:
Report
Collection:
-
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UNU Collections credentials) Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads wp2007-006.pdf PDF 
application/pdf 416.89KB -
Sub-type Working paper Author Notten, Geranda
de Neubourg, ChrisTitle The policy relevance of absolute and relative poverty headcounts: What's in a number? Publication Date 2007 Place of Publication Maastricht, NL Publisher Maastricht University Pages 40 Abstract Financial poverty indicators still play an important role in policymaking and evaluation. Countries such as the USA and the EU member states use one or several ���official�۪ poverty indicators on which success of poverty reduction policy is regularly monitored. Whereas the US poverty indicator is based on an absolute concept of poverty, the EU Laeken indicator is based on a relative concept. But the consequences of such a decision are considerable. As absolute and relative poverty indicators reflect related but conceptually distinct approaches to determining insufficient levels of wellbeing; they can yield very different poverty statistics, particularly over time. In this paper, we use the official EU and US poverty indicators to study the policy relevance of using either an absolute or a relative indicator. We find significant differences between the poverty estimates in poverty rates as well as in the poverty profiles. Benefit incidence- and adequacy rates are equally estimated and compared. The paper concludes that the differences between the two poverty concepts is more than important enough to support monitoring poverty and the related social and economic policies, using both relative and absolute poverty indicators. Keywords: poverty, absolute, relative, social policy, United States, European Union JEL: H53, H55, I3 Copyright Holder Maastricht Graduate School of Governance Copyright Year 2007 Copyright type All rights reserved -
Citation counts 
Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 485 Abstract Views, 336 File Downloads - Detailed Statistics Created: Fri, 13 Dec 2013, 12:12:48 JST