Researching social innovation: is the tail wagging the dog?

Emma L. M. Rhule and Allotey, Pascale, (2020). Researching social innovation: is the tail wagging the dog?. Online, 9:3 1-5

Document type:
Article
Collection:
UNU-IIGH Articles

Metadata
Documents
Links
Versions
Statistics
  • Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UNU Collections credentials)
    Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
    n2020-01-23_Emma_Rhule_Researching_Social_innovation.pdf 2020-01-23_Emma_Rhule_Researching_Social_innovation.pdf Click to show the corresponding preview/stream application/pdf; Bytes
  • Sub-type Journal article
    Author Emma L. M. Rhule
    Allotey, Pascale
    Title Researching social innovation: is the tail wagging the dog?
    Appearing in Online
    Volume 9:3
    Publication Date 2020
    Place of Publication Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Publisher The Authors
    Start page 1
    End page 5
    Language eng
    Abstract Background Social Innovation in health initiatives have the potential to address unmet community health needs. For sustainable change to occur, we need to understand how and why a given intervention is effective. Bringing together communities, innovators, researchers, and policy makers is a powerful way to address this knowledge gap but differing priorities and epistemological backgrounds can make collaboration challenging. Main text To overcome these barriers, stakeholders will need to design policies and work in ways that provide an enabling environment for innovative products and services. Inherently about people, the incorporation of community engagement approaches is necessary for both the development of social innovations and accompanying research methodologies. Whilst the 'appropriate' level of participation is linked to intended outcomes, researchers have a role to play in better understanding how to harness the power of community engagement and to ensure that community perspectives form part of the evidence base that informs policy and practice. Conclusions To effectively operate at the intersection between policy, social innovation, and research, all collaborators need to enter the process with the mindset of learners, rather than experts. Methods – quantitative and qualitative – must be selected according to research questions. The fields of implementation research, community-based participatory research, and realist research, amongst others, have much to offer. So do other sectors, notably education and business. In all this, researchers must assume the mantel of responsibility for research and not transfer the onus to communities under the guise of participation. By leveraging the expertise and knowledge of different ecosystem actors, we can design responsive health systems that integrate innovative approaches in ways that are greater than the sum of their parts.
    Keyword Social innovation
    Health systems
    Mixed methods
    Participation
    Community Engagement
    Policymaker
    Implementation research
    Copyright Holder The Authors
    Copyright Year 2020
    Copyright type Creative commons
    DOI 10.1186/s40249-019-0616-7
  • Versions
    Version Filter Type
  • Citation counts
    Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
    Access Statistics: 553 Abstract Views, 118 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
    Created: Thu, 23 Jan 2020, 16:15:36 JST by Nor Sazlin Said on behalf of UNU IIGH