One Swallow Does Not Make a Summer: Siloes, Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus
Kurian, Mathew, Scott, Christopher A., Reddy, V. Ratna, Alabaster, Graham, Nardocci, Adelaide, Portney, Kent E., Boer, Rizaldi and Hannibal, Bryce, (2019). One Swallow Does Not Make a Summer: Siloes, Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus. frontiers in Environmental Science, 7(32), 1-17
Document type:
Article
Collection:
-
Sub-type Journal article Author Kurian, Mathew
Scott, Christopher A.
Reddy, V. Ratna
Alabaster, Graham
Nardocci, Adelaide
Portney, Kent E.
Boer, Rizaldi
Hannibal, BryceTitle One Swallow Does Not Make a Summer: Siloes, Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus Appearing in frontiers in Environmental Science Volume 7 Issue No. 32 Publication Date 2019-03-21 Place of Publication Lausanne Publisher Frontiers Media S.A. Start page 1 End page 17 Language eng Abstract Synergies are required to ensure coordination between UN agencies (on norms and indicators), Member States (on coherence of policy instruments) and consumers (on perceptions of safety and affordability of services) to advance the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 6.3 which focusses on reuse of wastewater. In this paper we employ theoretical insights derived from an agent-based modeling approach to undertake a critical examination of the recent UN-WATER directive on SDG target 6.3 and advocate for an improved understanding of factors that determine whether and how effective wastewater reuse will be possible while accommodating for regional variation and institutional change. We demonstrate that by applying the Nexus approach it is feasible to overcome siloes by forging concepts of trade-offs and synergies to draw out coupled perspectives of bio-physical and institutional dimensions of water-energy-food interactions. By employing this proposition, the paper advocates for place-based observatories as a mechanism that can support valorization of data and methodological assumptions as a precursor to robust monitoring of the SDG's. The systematic use of literature reviews and expert opinion to develop and pilot-test composite indices via place-based observatories raises the prospect of a data light approach to monitoring SDGs; specifically, what are the merits of relying on extensive survey data compared to composite indices that while being amenable to supporting benchmarking and scenario analysis can provide the insight needed to inform decision-making and robust monitoring of global goals? Keyword Water-Energy-Food Nexus
Sustainable Development Goals
trade-offs
siloes
synergies
agent-based modeling
Wastewater Reuse Effectiveness Index
place-based observatoriesCopyright Holder The Authors Copyright Year 2019 Copyright type Creative commons DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00032 -
Citation counts Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 635 Abstract Views - Detailed Statistics Created: Wed, 27 Mar 2019, 19:30:56 JST by Claudia Matthias on behalf of UNU FLORES