The Problem of Comparison in Comparative Regionalism
-
Sub-type Working paper Author De Lombaerde, Philippe
Söderbaum, Fredrik
Van Langenhove, Luk
Baert, FrancisEditor De Lombaerde, Philippe
Söderbaum, Fredrik
Van Langenhove, Luk
Baert, FrancisTitle The Problem of Comparison in Comparative Regionalism Volume/Issue No. 7 Publication Date 2009 Place of Publication Miami Publisher Jean Monnet Chair of the University of Miami Language eng Abstract There is virtually no systematic debate regarding the fundamentals of comparative research in the field of international regionalism. The research field is very fragmented and the lack of interaction between EU studies and regionalism in the rest of the world is stark. There is also a lack of communication between scholars from various theoretical stand-points and research traditions. Related to these two divides is the tension between idiographic and nomothetic analysis. The purpose of this article is to contribute to this largely neglected debate on how to conduct and address three interrelated problems: a conceptual, a theoretical and a methodological one. Our claim is that the future of comparative regionalism should be one where jointly old divides are closed and new frontiers are crossed. This requires a combination of more conceptual rigor, theoretical eclecticism, and sounder empirical research methods.
Keyword Comparative regionalism Copyright Holder EUCE, University of Miami Copyright Year 2009 Copyright type All rights reserved -
Citation counts Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 338 Abstract Views - Detailed Statistics Created: Fri, 15 Feb 2019, 14:32:53 JST