Why We Should Include Soil Structural Dynamics of Agricultural Soils in Hydrological Models

Chandrasekhar, Parvathy, Kreiselmeier, Janis, Schwen, Andreas, Weninger, Thomas, Julich, Stefan, Feger, Karl-Heinz and Schwärzel, Kai, (2018). Why We Should Include Soil Structural Dynamics of Agricultural Soils in Hydrological Models. Water, 10(12), 1-18

Document type:
Article
Collection:
UNU-FLORES Articles

Metadata
Links
Versions
Statistics
  • Sub-type Journal article
    Author Chandrasekhar, Parvathy
    Kreiselmeier, Janis
    Schwen, Andreas
    Weninger, Thomas
    Julich, Stefan
    Feger, Karl-Heinz
    Schwärzel, Kai
    Title Why We Should Include Soil Structural Dynamics of Agricultural Soils in Hydrological Models
    Appearing in Water
    Volume 10
    Issue No. 12
    Publication Date 2018-12-15
    Place of Publication Basel
    Publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
    Start page 1
    End page 18
    Language eng
    Abstract Surface soil structure is sensitive to natural and anthropogenic impacts that alter soil hydraulic properties (SHP). These alterations have distinct consequences on the water cycle. In this review, we summarized published findings on the quantitative effects of different agricultural management practices on SHP and the subsequent response of the water balance components. Generally, immediately after tillage, soils show a high abundance of large pores, which are temporally unstable and collapse due to environmental factors like rainfall. Nevertheless, most hydrological modeling studies consider SHP as temporally constant when predicting the flow of water and solutes in the atmosphere-plant-soil system. There have been some developments in mathematical approaches to capture the temporal dynamics of soil pore space. We applied one such pore evolution model to two datasets to evaluate its suitability to predict soil pore space dynamics after disturbance. Lack of knowledge on how dispersion of pore size distribution behaves after tillage may have led to over-estimation of some values predicted by the model. Nevertheless, we found that the model predicted the evolution of soil pore space reasonably well (r2 > 0.80 in most cases). The limiting factor to efficiently calibrate and apply such modeling tools is not in the theoretical part but rather the lack of adequate soil structural and hydrologic data.
    Keyword Temporal dynamics
    Soil hydraulic properties
    Soil structure
    Tillage effects
    Pore size distribution
    Copyright Holder The Authors
    Copyright Year 2018
    Copyright type Creative commons
    DOI 10.3390/w10121862
  • Versions
    Version Filter Type
  • Citation counts
    Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
    Access Statistics: 539 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
    Created: Wed, 16 Jan 2019, 00:07:42 JST by Claudia Matthias on behalf of UNU FLORES