Agenda Disputes and Strategic Venue Preferences: The Doha Crisis and Europe’s Flight to Regionalism
Toro, Francisco (2008). Agenda Disputes and Strategic Venue Preferences: The Doha Crisis and Europe’s Flight to Regionalism. UNU-MERIT.
Document type:
Report
Collection:
-
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UNU Collections credentials) Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads wp2008-048.pdf PDF 
application/pdf 265.91KB -
Author Toro, Francisco Title Agenda Disputes and Strategic Venue Preferences: The Doha Crisis and Europe’s Flight to Regionalism Publication Date 2008 Publisher UNU-MERIT Abstract Agenda-setting disputes have become increasingly central to the conduct of multilateral trade negotiations. Introducing some simple concepts from Negotiations Theory, we focus on the dynamic interplay between the Doha Round’s agenda setting and bargaining stages, underlining their implications for the European Union’s evolving win-set in the negotiations. We argue that, by successful enshrining a narrow agenda, key developing countries reduced the set of possible final settlements that were both multilaterally viable and attractive from the point of view of key European interests. In an attempt to avoid imposing concentrated costs on those interests, the European Commission has responded by pursuing its best alternative to a multilateral agreement, shifting negotiating resources away from the multilateral table and towards regional FTA negotiations. Keyword Trade policy-making
Doha round
EU
Sectoral lobbying
Trade negotiationsJEL F13 Copyright Holder UNU-MERIT Copyright Year 2008 ISSN 1871-9872 -
Citation counts 
Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 747 Abstract Views, 117 File Downloads - Detailed Statistics Created: Wed, 11 Dec 2013, 16:23:11 JST