Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation – Lancet Commission on planetary health. Making the sustainable development goals operational through an urban agenda: perspectives from science

Whitmee, Sarah, Haines, Andy, Beyrer, Chris, Boltz, Frederick, Capon, Anthony G., Dias, Braulio Ferreira D.S, Ezeh, Alex, Frumkin, Howard, Gong, Peng, Head, Peter, Horton, Richard, Mace, Georgina M., Marten, Robert, Myers, Samuel S., Nishtar, Sania, Osofsky, Steven A., Pattanayak, Subhrendu K., Pongsiri, Montira J., Romanelli, Cristina, Soucat, Agnes et al., (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation – Lancet Commission on planetary health. Making the sustainable development goals operational through an urban agenda: perspectives from science. Lancet, 1-56

Document type:
Article
Collection:

Metadata
Links
Versions
Statistics
  • Sub-type Journal article
    Author Whitmee, Sarah
    Haines, Andy
    Beyrer, Chris
    Boltz, Frederick
    Capon, Anthony G.
    Dias, Braulio Ferreira D.S
    Ezeh, Alex
    Frumkin, Howard
    Gong, Peng
    Head, Peter
    Horton, Richard
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Marten, Robert
    Myers, Samuel S.
    Nishtar, Sania
    Osofsky, Steven A.
    Pattanayak, Subhrendu K.
    Pongsiri, Montira J.
    Romanelli, Cristina
    Soucat, Agnes
    Vega, Jeanette
    Yach, Derek
    Title Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation – Lancet Commission on planetary health. Making the sustainable development goals operational through an urban agenda: perspectives from science
    Appearing in Lancet
    Publication Date 2015-07-15
    Place of Publication London
    Publisher Elsevier
    Start page 1
    End page 56
    Language eng
    Abstract

    Far-reaching changes to the structure and function of the Earth's natural systems represent a growing threat to human health. And yet, global health has mainly improved as these changes have gathered pace. What is the explanation? As a Commission, we are deeply concerned that the explanation is straightforward and sobering: we have been mortgaging the health of future generations to realise economic and development gains in the present. By unsustainably exploiting nature's resources, human civilisation has flourished but now risks substantial health effects from the degradation of nature's life support systems in the future. Health effects from changes to the environment including climatic change, ocean acidification, land degradation, water scarcity, overexploitation of fisheries, and biodiversity loss pose serious challenges to the global health gains of the past several decades and are likely to become increasingly dominant during the second half of this century and beyond. These striking trends are driven by highly inequitable, inefficient, and unsustainable patterns of resource consumption and technological development, together with population growth.

    We identify three categories of challenges that have to be addressed to maintain and enhance human health in the face of increasingly harmful environmental trends. Firstly, conceptual and empathy failures (imagination challenges), such as an over-reliance on gross domestic product as a measure of human progress, the failure to account for future health and environmental harms over present day gains, and the disproportionate effect of those harms on the poor and those in developing nations. Secondly, knowledge failures (research and information challenges), such as failure to address social and environmental drivers of ill health, a historical scarcity of transdisciplinary research and funding, together with an unwillingness or inability to deal with uncertainty within decision making frameworks. Thirdly, implementation failures (governance challenges), such as how governments and institutions delay recognition and responses to threats, especially when faced with uncertainties, pooled common resources, and time lags between action and effect.

    Although better evidence is needed to underpin appropriate policies than is available at present, this should not be used as an excuse for inaction. Substantial potential exists to link action to reduce environmental damage with improved health outcomes for nations at all levels of economic development. This Commission identifies opportunities for action by six key constituencies: health professionals, research funders and the academic community, the UN and Bretton Woods bodies, governments, investors and corporate reporting bodies, and civil society organisations.

    Depreciation of natural capital and nature's subsidy should be accounted for so that economy and nature are not falsely separated. Policies should balance social progress, environmental sustainability, and the economy. To support a world population of 9–10 billion people or more, resilient food and agricultural systems are needed to address both undernutrition and overnutrition, reduce waste, diversify diets, and minimise environmental damage. Meeting the need for modern family planning can improve health in the short term—eg, from reduced maternal mortality and reduced pressures on the environment and on infrastructure.

    Planetary health offers an unprecedented opportunity for advocacy of global and national reforms of taxes and subsidies for many sectors of the economy, including energy, agriculture, water, fisheries, and health. Regional trade treaties should act to further incorporate the protection of health in the near and long term. Several essential steps need to be taken to transform the economy to support planetary health. These steps include a reduction of waste through the creation of products that are more durable and require less energy and materials to manufacture than those often produced at present; the incentivisation of recycling, reuse, and repair; and the substitution of hazardous materials with safer alternatives.

    Copyright Holder Elsevier Ltd
    Copyright Year 2015
    Copyright type Creative commons
    DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1
  • Versions
    Version Filter Type
  • Citation counts
    Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article
    Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
    Access Statistics: 1025 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
    Created: Wed, 30 Sep 2015, 11:36:44 JST