Participatory research for adaptive water management in a transition country: a case study from Uzbekistan

Hirsch, Darya, Abrami, Geraldine, Giordano, Raffaele, Liersch, Stefan, Matin, Nilufar and Schlüter, Maja, (2010). Participatory research for adaptive water management in a transition country: a case study from Uzbekistan. Ecology and Society, 15(3), 1-33

Document type:
Article
Collection:

Metadata
Documents
Links
Versions
Statistics
  • Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UNU Collections credentials)
    Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
    ES-2010-3549.pdf PDF application/pdf 172.18KB
  • Sub-type Journal article
    Author Hirsch, Darya
    Abrami, Geraldine
    Giordano, Raffaele
    Liersch, Stefan
    Matin, Nilufar
    Schlüter, Maja
    Title Participatory research for adaptive water management in a transition country: a case study from Uzbekistan
    Appearing in Ecology and Society
    Volume 15
    Issue No. 3
    Publication Date 2010
    Place of Publication Online
    Publisher Open Access Publishing
    Start page 1
    End page 33
    Language eng
    Abstract

    Participatory research has in recent years become a popular approach for problem-oriented scientific research that aims to tackle complex problems in a real management context. Within the European Union project NeWater, stakeholder processes were initiated in seven case studies to develop approaches for adaptive water management. The Uzbek part of the Amudarya River basin was one of the studied river basins. However, given the current political and cultural context in Uzbekistan, which provides little room for stakeholder participation, it was unclear to what extent participation could be realized there. In this paper, we present an evaluation of the participatory research carried out in the Amudarya case study with respect to (i) the choice and application of different participatory methods and their adaptation to the given political, socioeconomic, and cultural environment, (ii) their usefulness in improving system understanding and developing strategies and measures to improve water management and monitoring, and (iii) their acceptance and suitability for enhancing policy-making processes in the Amudarya River basin context. The main lessons learned from the comparison of the different participatory methods were (1) the stakeholder process provided an opportunity for meetings and discussions among stakeholders from different organizational levels and thus promoted communication between different levels and organizations, and (2) in a context where most stakeholders are not generally involved in policy-making, there is a danger of raising expectations that a research project cannot meet, e.g., of transferring local interests to higher levels. Our experience shows that in order to choose participatory methods and adapt them to the Uzbek cultural and political setting (and most likely this applies to other post-Soviet transition countries as well), four aspects should be taken into account: the time required to prepare and apply the method, good information about the participants and the context in which the method will be applied, knowledge of the local language(s), and careful training of local moderators. While these aspects are relevant to any application of participatory methods, they become even more important in a political and socio-cultural setting such as that found in Uzbekistan. One added value of the activities and a crucial aspect of a participatory research processes was the capacity building of local scientists and practitioners, which facilitates the further application of the methods.

    Copyright Holder Open Access Publishing
    Copyright Year 2010
    Copyright type Creative commons
  • Versions
    Version Filter Type
  • Citation counts
    Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
    Access Statistics: 521 Abstract Views, 330 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
    Created: Fri, 17 Oct 2014, 12:06:49 JST