When is a Wave a Wave? Long Waves as Empirical and Theoretical Constructs from a Complex Systems Perspective

Silverberg, Gerald (2005). When is a Wave a Wave? Long Waves as Empirical and Theoretical Constructs from a Complex Systems Perspective. UNU-MERIT Research Memoranda. UNU-MERIT.

Document type:
Report

Metadata
Documents
Versions
Statistics
  • Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UNU Collections credentials)
    Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
    rm2005-016.pdf PDF application/pdf 237.27KB
  • Sub-type Working paper
    Author Silverberg, Gerald
    Title When is a Wave a Wave? Long Waves as Empirical and Theoretical Constructs from a Complex Systems Perspective
    Series Title UNU-MERIT Research Memoranda
    Volume/Issue No. 16
    Publication Date 2005
    Publisher UNU-MERIT
    Language eng
    Abstract While long waves have been seriously discussed by economists for almost one hundred years, to date there is no scientific consensus that particular frequency components are in any way privileged in the undoubtedly fluctuating history of modern economic and political development. This is disappointing for two reasons. First, the demonstration that robust, well-defined periodic components existed would present us with a plausible tool for forecasting. And second, they could (and their purported existence has variously been thought to) provide insight into underlying causal mechanisms that generate the observed patterns. The data, I argue, only provide support for a continuous spectral pattern of a power law, 1/fa. This is borne out in the paper by the analysis of political indicators such as the newly revised Modelski/Thompson sea power index and the Levy great powers conflict data. Claims for underlying low-dimensional chaos are only partly substantiated. Individual peaks at various frequencies in the spectrum are probably only due to 'random noise' factors unique to segments of the record and not robust across countries and historical episodes. While one could then play the game of finding ad hoc explanations for why the 'K-wave' did not take its expected form in this or that century, from the perspective of the theory of complex dynamics it seems more plausible to conclude that a periodic model is not appropriate. Rather, the underlying model is more likely to be of the self-organized criticality or percolation type, characterized by power-law or fractal behavior rather than well-defined periodicity. I highlight some features common to several models of innovation/ economic dynamics and war/hegemonic cycles, such as highly clustered but nonperiodic critical events and resulting long life cycles of rise and decline, that may serve as a plausible explanatory mechanism for this 'revisionist' interpretation of the empirical record on long waves.
    Keyword Long waves
    War
    Hegemony
    Political cycles
    Complex systems
    Nonlinear dynamics
    Copyright Year 2005
    Copyright type All rights reserved
  • Versions
    Version Filter Type
  • Citation counts
    Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
    Access Statistics: 402 Abstract Views, 104 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
    Created: Fri, 13 Dec 2013, 12:39:13 JST