Reconstructing high-resolution groundwater level data using a hybrid random forest model to quantify distributed groundwater changes in the Indus Basin
Arshad, Arfan, Mirchi, Ali, Vilcaez, Javier, Umar Akbar, Muhammad and Madani, Kaveh, (2024). Reconstructing high-resolution groundwater level data using a hybrid random forest model to quantify distributed groundwater changes in the Indus Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 628 130535-n/a
Document type:
Article
Collection:
-
Sub-type Journal article Author Arshad, Arfan
Mirchi, Ali
Vilcaez, Javier
Umar Akbar, Muhammad
Madani, KavehTitle Reconstructing high-resolution groundwater level data using a hybrid random forest model to quantify distributed groundwater changes in the Indus Basin Appearing in Journal of Hydrology Volume 628 Publication Date 2024-01-01 Place of Publication Amesterdam Publisher Elsevier B.V. Start page 130535 End page n/a Language eng Abstract High-resolution, continuous groundwater data is important for place-based adaptive aquifer management. This information is unavailable in many areas due to spatial sparsity of and temporal gaps in groundwater monitoring. This study advances the ability to generate high-resolution (1 km2), temporally continuous estimates of groundwater level (GWL) changes by incorporating 1 km2 covariates and existing piezometer observations into predictive modeling. We employed a hybrid machine learning (ML) model, primarily using the geographically weighted random forest (RFgw) model. To assess the performance of the RFgw model, we conducted a comprehensive comparison with the SGS geostatistical method and non-spatial ML models (RF and XGBoost). The framework was implemented across the Indus Basin using biannual (July and Oct) GWL data from piezometers and local covariates from 2003 to 2020. The RFgw model demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting GWLs, improving R2 by 10 %, 17 %, and 22 % compared to SGS, RF, and XGBoost, respectively. Notably, SGS, RF, and XGBoost substantially underestimated the GWL in deeper wells (7–11 m), whereas RFgw showed a much smaller underestimation (up to ∼ 3 m). The 90 % prediction interval revealed that RFgw had less uncertainty (1–3 m) followed by RF (2–5 m), and SGS and XGBoost (up to 8 m) for most testing piezometers. Incorporating high-resolution covariates into RFgw predictive modeling provided reliable estimates of GWL changes for unmonitored sites. Using the reconstructed GWL data, we examined the GWL changes in head (i.e., upstream) and tail (i.e., downstream) farms within canal distributaries, illustrating faster groundwater drawdown in tail farms (e.g., 0.82 m/yr) than head farms (0.02 m/yr in the Hakra canal distributary). Densely populated urban areas (e.g., Lahore, Multan, and Faisalabad) had the highest GWL decline (e.g., up to 0.9 m/yr). The framework can be used in other groundwater-stressed regions to support better aquifer management in the face of limited in-situ observations. Copyright Holder Elsevier B. V. Copyright Year 2024 Copyright type All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130535 -
Citation counts Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 44 Abstract Views - Detailed Statistics Created: Thu, 26 Sep 2024, 03:14:20 JST by Haideh Beigi on behalf of UNU INWEH