Insurance value of biodiversity in the Anthropocene is the full resilience value
Hahn, Thomas, Sioen, Giles Bruno, Gasparatos, Alexandros, Elmqvist, Thomas, Brondizio, Eduardo, Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, Folke, Carl, Setiawati, Martiwi Diah, Atmaja, Tri, Arini, Enggar Yustisi, Jarzebski, Marcin Pawel, Fukushi, Kensuke and Takeuchi, Kazuhiko, (2023). Insurance value of biodiversity in the Anthropocene is the full resilience value. Ecological Economics, 208(June 2023), n/a-n/a
Document type:
Article
Collection:
-
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UNU Collections credentials) Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads Hahn_Sioen_Gasparatos_et.al.13.06.2023.pdf Hahn_Sioen_Gasparatos_et.al.13.06.2023.pdf 
application/pdf 884.26KB -
Related Links Link Description 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800923000629?via%3Dihub Link
http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107799 Full text from publisher -
Sub-type Journal article Author Hahn, Thomas
Sioen, Giles Bruno
Gasparatos, Alexandros
Elmqvist, Thomas
Brondizio, Eduardo
Gómez-Baggethun, Erik
Folke, Carl
Setiawati, Martiwi Diah
Atmaja, Tri
Arini, Enggar Yustisi
Jarzebski, Marcin Pawel
Fukushi, Kensuke
Takeuchi, KazuhikoTitle Insurance value of biodiversity in the Anthropocene is the full resilience value Appearing in Ecological Economics Volume 208 Issue No. June 2023 Publication Date 2023-03-13 Place of Publication Boston Publisher International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE) Start page n/a End page n/a Language eng Abstract Recently two distinctly different conceptualisations of insurance value of biodiversity/ ecosystems have been developed. The ecosystem framing addresses the full resilience value without singling out subjective risk preferences. Conversely, the economic framing focuses exactly on this subjective value of risk aversion, implying that the insurance value is zero for risk neutral persons. Here we analyse the differences conceptually and empirically, and relate this to the broader socio-cultural dimensions of social-ecological resilience. The uncertainty of the Anthropocene blurs the distinction between subjective/objective. We show that the economic framing has been operationalised only in specific cases while the broader literature on resilience, disaster risk reduction, and nature-based solutions tend to address the full value of resilience. Yet, the empirical literature that relates to insurance value of biodiversity is hardly consistent with resilience theory because the slow underlying variables defining resilience are rarely addressed. We suggest how the empirical literature on insurance value can be better aligned with resilience theory. Since the ecosystem framing of insurance value captures the essence of the resilience, we propose using the concept “resilience value” as it may reduce the present ambiguity in terminology and conceptualisation of insurance value of biodiversity. Keyword Ecosystem services
Insurance value of ecosystems
Natural insurance value
ResilienceCopyright Holder The Authors Copyright Year 2023 Copyright type Creative commons DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107799 -
Citation counts 
Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 174 Abstract Views, 76 File Downloads - Detailed Statistics Created: Wed, 23 Aug 2023, 14:01:45 JST by Hanna Takemoto on behalf of UNU IAS