Diverse values of nature for sustainability
Pascual, Unai, Balvanera, Patricia, Anderson, Christopher B., Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca, Christie, Michael, González-Jiménez, David, Martin, Adrian, Raymond, Christopher M., Termansen, Mette, Vatn, Arild, Athayde, Simone, Baptiste, Brigitte, Barton, David N., Jacobs, Sander, Kelemen, Eszter, Kumar, Ritesh, Lazos, Elena, Mwampamba, Tuyeni H., Nakangu, Barbara, O’Farrell, Patrick et al., (2023). Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature, n/a-n/a
Document type:
Article
Collection:
-
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UNU Collections credentials) Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads Diverse_Values_of_Nature.pdf Diverse Values of Nature.pdf 
application/pdf 4.37MB -
Related Links Link Description 
http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9 Full text from publisher -
Sub-type Journal article Author Pascual, Unai
Balvanera, Patricia
Anderson, Christopher B.
Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
Christie, Michael
González-Jiménez, David
Martin, Adrian
Raymond, Christopher M.
Termansen, Mette
Vatn, Arild
Athayde, Simone
Baptiste, Brigitte
Barton, David N.
Jacobs, Sander
Kelemen, Eszter
Kumar, Ritesh
Lazos, Elena
Mwampamba, Tuyeni H.
Nakangu, Barbara
O’Farrell, Patrick
Subramanian, Suneetha M.
Et al.Title Diverse values of nature for sustainability Appearing in Nature Publication Date 2023-08-09 Place of Publication London Publisher Nature Research Start page n/a End page n/a Language eng Abstract Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being addressing the global biodiversity crisis still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature’s diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understanding of how and why nature is (under)valued is more urgent than ever. Notwithstanding agreements to incorporate nature’s values into actions, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)5 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, predominant environmental and development policies still prioritize a subset of values, particularly those linked to markets, and ignore other ways people relate to and benefit from nature. Arguably, a ‘values crisis’ underpins the intertwined crises of biodiversity loss and climate change, pandemic emergence and socio-environmental injustices. On the basis of more than 50,000 scientific publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local knowledge sources, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) assessed knowledge on nature’s diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into decisions. Applying this evidence, combinations of values-centred approaches are proposed to improve valuation and address barriers to uptake, ultimately leveraging transformative changes towards more just (that is, fair treatment of people and nature, including inter- and intragenerational equity) and sustainable futures. UNBIS Thesaurus BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
ECOLOGYKeyword Ecosystem services
SustainabilityCopyright Holder The Authors Copyright Year 2023 Copyright type Creative commons DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9 -
Citation counts 
Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 489 Abstract Views, 107 File Downloads - Detailed Statistics Created: Fri, 18 Aug 2023, 12:32:29 JST by Hanna Takemoto on behalf of UNU IAS