Are Child Domestic Workers Worse Off Than Their Peers? Comparing Children in Domestic Work, Child Marriage, and Kinship Care With Biological Children of Household Heads: Evidence from Zimbabwe

Musizvingoza, Ronald, Blagbrough, Jonathan and Pocock, Nicola S., (2022). Are Child Domestic Workers Worse Off Than Their Peers? Comparing Children in Domestic Work, Child Marriage, and Kinship Care With Biological Children of Household Heads: Evidence from Zimbabwe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 1-18

Document type:
Article
Collection:
UNU-IIGH Articles

Metadata
Documents
Links
Versions
Statistics
  • Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your UNU Collections credentials)
    Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
    ijerph-19-07405-v2.pdf ijerph-19-07405-v2.pdf application/pdf 655.48KB
  • Sub-type Journal article
    Author Musizvingoza, Ronald
    Blagbrough, Jonathan
    Pocock, Nicola S.
    Title Are Child Domestic Workers Worse Off Than Their Peers? Comparing Children in Domestic Work, Child Marriage, and Kinship Care With Biological Children of Household Heads: Evidence from Zimbabwe
    Appearing in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    Volume 19
    Issue No. 12
    Publication Date 2022-06-16
    Place of Publication Basel
    Publisher MDPI
    Start page 1
    End page 18
    Language eng
    Abstract Child domestic work is a hidden form of child labour driven by poverty and social norms. However, little is known about the situations of child domestic workers. This study aims to describe and analyse gender-specific working conditions, health, and educational outcomes among hidden child domestic workers (CDWs) living in third-party homes relative to married children, biological children, and other children in kinship care. Data from the 2019 Zimbabwe Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) were analysed. Descriptive statistics and bivariable logistic regression were used to describe frequency and estimated prevalence. Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) were used to identify exposures and inform the selection of covariates. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the effect of each exposure variable. The prevalence of CDWs was 1.5% and CDWs were mainly girls and living in much wealthier households with more educated household heads while married girls were living in much poorer households. When compared among girls themselves, being a CDW was significantly associated with having a functional disability, while married girls were more frequently engaged in hazardous working conditions. We provide the first intersectional analysis comparing work, violence, and health outcomes among CDWs, married children and other children. Child protection measures are needed to safeguard children in domestic work and marriages.
    UNBIS Thesaurus DOMESTIC WORKERS
    MARRIAGE
    KINSHIP
    HOUSEHOLDS
    EVIDENCE
    ZIMBABWE
    Copyright Holder The Authors
    Copyright Year 2022
    Copyright type Creative commons
    DOI 10.3390/ijerph19127405
  • Versions
    Version Filter Type
  • Citation counts
    Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
    Access Statistics: 164 Abstract Views, 30 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
    Created: Tue, 21 Jun 2022, 11:29:31 JST by Radhika Das on behalf of UNU IIGH