Temporal issues in life cycle assessment - a systematic review

Lueddeckens, Stefan, Saling, Peter and Guenther, Edeltraud, (2020). Temporal issues in life cycle assessment - a systematic review. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25 1385-1401

Document type:
Article
Collection:
UNU-FLORES Articles

Metadata
Links
Versions
Statistics
  • Sub-type Journal article
    Author Lueddeckens, Stefan
    Saling, Peter
    Guenther, Edeltraud
    Title Temporal issues in life cycle assessment - a systematic review
    Appearing in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
    Volume 25
    Publication Date 2020-05-04
    Place of Publication Cham, Switzerland
    Publisher Springer Nature
    Start page 1385
    End page 1401
    Language eng
    Abstract Purpose: Case studies on life cycle assessments frequently admit that the precision of their outcome could be undermined due to temporal issues, though they usually refrain from offering much more detail. In addition, available overview papers and reviews on problems and challenges in LCA do not address the whole range of temporal issues. As those are major sources of inaccuracies and influence each other, it is important to get a clear picture of them, to close gaps in definitions, to systemize temporal issues, and to show their interdependencies and proposed solutions. In order to identify the state of science on those questions, we conducted a systematic literature review. Methods: We first systematized temporal issues based on ISO 14040ff and divided them into six types: time horizon, discounting, temporal resolution of the inventory, time-dependent characterization, dynamic weighting, and time-dependent normalization. Building on that, we identified suitable search terms and developed an analysis grid for the content analysis. We included only methodological papers and case studies with original findings on solutions for temporal issues. Bibliographic data, impact types, industrial fields, and methodological contributions were analyzed. Results and discussion: Literature differentiates between different types of time horizons. There is one for the whole assessment, defined in goal and scope, one for the life cycle inventory, and one for the impact characterization. Setting a time horizon for the assessment is regarded as equivalent to the application of discounting. Both very long and very short time horizons of the assessment are not practical depending on the topic assessed in the LCA. Very short ones would offend the principle of intergenerational equality, while very long ones would marginalize short-term actions and thereby reduce incentives to act. There is consensus in the literature that temporally differentiated life cycle inventories and time-dependent, or at least time horizon dependent, characterization improve the accuracy of LCA. Generally, dynamic life cycle assessments are attractive for companies because the calculation results are not only more accurate but are often also lower than in static life cycle assessments. Conclusion: The main questions where we did not find consensus are the issue of the length of the time horizon of the assessment and the issue of discounting. Those are regarded as subjective and are encountered with sensitivity or scenario analysis. Further investigations should be taken for a better understanding of this issue and for concrete solutions because their influence on the results of life cycle assessments is often fundamental.
    Keyword Temporal issues
    Life cycle assessment
    LCA
    LCIA
    Time horizon
    Discounting
    Dynamic
    Copyright Holder The Authors
    Copyright Year 2020
    Copyright type Creative commons
    DOI 10.1007/s11367-020-01757-1
  • Versions
    Version Filter Type
  • Citation counts
    Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
    Access Statistics: 779 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
    Created: Fri, 21 Aug 2020, 17:55:57 JST by Eric Siegmund on behalf of UNU FLORES